<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Wisdom of Clouds - Latest Comments in Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://cloudcomputing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cloudcomputing.disqus.com/ciscos_nexus_1000v_and_the_cloud_is_it_really_a_big_deal/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:30:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-17703531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As longs as it has CISCO written all over I trust it. I know that many well known businesses can make mistakes but this one really makes me think they're serious enough to make good products. &lt;br&gt;_______________ &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.webfusion.co.uk/dedicatedservers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webfusion.co.uk/dedicatedservers/"&gt;linux dedicated servers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FreddySimpson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:30:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-2416105</link><description>&lt;p&gt;See!  I knew there were some very cloud-smart people working on that project!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesurquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:20:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-2416091</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I will update the post to reflect this.  I am unfortunately unable to make VMWorld this year, but I'd love to get  a demo sometime.  Send me an email at jurquhart at yahoo dot com.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesurquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 03:18:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-2398842</link><description>&lt;p&gt;James:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am glad our announcements yesterday seem on target for you.  So, to clarify, the Nexus 1000v switches are "stackable", or at least virtually stackable.  This means that a single Nexus 1000v can span multiple physical servers.  So, for example, you could have a single switching domain for a VI cluster.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If you swing by the booth, you can check out the demo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Omar Sultan&lt;br&gt;Cisco&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Omar Sultan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 11:24:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-2397577</link><description>&lt;p&gt;James: You were at Cassatt? I was also myself, I worked in the MN office. I'm now at Cisco working on the Nexus 1000v. Glad to see you like what we've done so far.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kyle Mestery</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:02:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-2397566</link><description>&lt;p&gt;VN-Link is just the capacity to support persistent network services for a VM which can be achieved with either an nx5k or the nx1000v  according to this Cisco &lt;a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/solution_overview_c22-494040.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps9441/ps9902/solution_overview_c22-494040.html"&gt;VN-Link intro&lt;/a&gt;.  Actual stacking capacity is still an open question--but the data sheet you link implies there is some ability to have the nx1000v span physical boxes (at least 2) and that that would be a prereq for maintaining network state after a vMotion move.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Aneel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:01:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>