<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Wisdom of Clouds - Latest Comments</title><link>http://cloudcomputing.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://cloudcomputing.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:30:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cisco's Nexus 1000v and the Cloud: Is it really a big deal?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/ciscos-nexus-1000v-and-cloud-is-it.html#comment-17703531</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As longs as it has CISCO written all over I trust it. I know that many well known businesses can make mistakes but this one really makes me think they're serious enough to make good products. &lt;br&gt;_______________ &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.webfusion.co.uk/dedicatedservers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webfusion.co.uk/dedicatedservers/"&gt;linux dedicated servers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">FreddySimpson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 01:30:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon Adds Windows Server to EC2</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/10/amazon-adds-windows-server-to-ec2.html#comment-17702595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know why Amazon hasn't thought of using &lt;a href="http://www.webfusion.co.uk/dedicatedservers/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.webfusion.co.uk/dedicatedservers/"&gt;windows dedicated servers&lt;/a&gt; earlier. They've had quite a history, changed their hosts for a while but they never had the site down. That's something!&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eddiepetosa</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 00:42:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Quick Guide To The "Big Four" Cloud Offerings</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/quick-guide-to-big-four-cloud-offerings.html#comment-16277413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cloud computing, the dynamic data center.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cloud computing helps to increase the speed at which applications are deployed, helping to increase the pace of innovated networked computing.  Service deployed applications;  Cloud computing can be provided using an enterprise data center’s own servers, or it can be provided by a cloud provider that takes all of the capital risk of owning the infrastructure.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cloud computing incorporates virtualization, data and application on-demand deployment, internet delivery of services, and open source software.  Virtualization enables a dynamic data center where servers provide resources that are utilized as needed with resources changing dynamically in order to meet the needed workload.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The combination of virtual machines and virtual appliances used for server deployment objects is one of the key features of cloud computing.  Additionally, company’s can merge a storage cloud that provides a virtualized storage platform and is managed through an API, or Web-based interfaces for file management, and application data deployments.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Layered Service providers offering pay-by-use cloud computing solutions can be adjacent to company’s equipment leases. Public clouds are run by third party service providers and applications from different customers are likely to be mixed together on the cloud’s servers, storage systems, and networks.  Private clouds are built for the exclusive use of one client, providing the utmost control over data, security, and quality of service. Private clouds can also be built and managed by a company’s own IT administrator.  Hybrid clouds combine both public and private cloud models which may be used to handle planned workload spikes, or storage clouds configuration.  Dedicated audits for security policies are a must.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The benefits of deploying applications using cloud computing include reducing run time and response time, minimizing the purchasing and deployment of physical infrastructure. Considerations for Energy efficiency, flexibility, simplified systems administration, pricing based on consumption, and most of all limiting the footprint of the data center.  Virtualized solutions:  &lt;a href="http://www.shopricom.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.shopricom.com"&gt;http://www.shopricom.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rss1965</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 18:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cloud Computing and the Constitution</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/cloud-computing-and-constitution.html#comment-15432758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If your company originates from within the US, your data is under US regulations.  If you're outside of the US &amp;amp; house data with a company whose technology is based within or on US systems - it is subject to US Law.  Only way to theoretically circumvent this is to establish a company outside of the US and store your information there - caveat is that if the US wants what you have then they're gonna get to it (legal or not).  Good rule of thumb - if your data is available via a network &amp;amp; that network is connected to the Internet then it's public to the world.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rico479</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:52:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "Follow the law" computing</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/06/follow-law-computing.html#comment-15186263</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What I can say  is very nice and helpful as well as informative post...really help me very much more!!  Thanks..&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sain-web.com"&gt;sain-web.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sweet_Home_Improvement</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 05:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GigaSpaces introduces portable PaaS</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/10/gigaspaces-introduces-portable-paas.html#comment-15118885</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is quite impressive, I am pleased to read this post, keep posts like this coming, you totally&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;rock!&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://sain-web.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="sain-web.com"&gt;sain-web.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nail Arts Designer</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 05:04:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The PaaS Spectrum: Choosing Your Coding Cloud</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/10/paas-spectrum-choosing-your-coding.html#comment-12763524</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good comments: I'm looking at what should be stated as best guidelines for coding to the cloud. For example (irrespective of language) how do you code for:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- horizontal V's vertical scalability&lt;br&gt;- loose coupling&lt;br&gt;- data/information versus functional services&lt;br&gt;- static versus dynamic IP addresses&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there any thinking on best practices on soem coding and designgenerics for public v's privae cloud ..etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for any comments and/or poiners&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mal&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maldini3105</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:50:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The PaaS Spectrum: Choosing Your Coding Cloud</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/10/paas-spectrum-choosing-your-coding.html#comment-12763520</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good comments: I'm looking at what should be stated as best guidelines for coding to the cloud. For example (irrespective of language) how do you code for:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- horizontal V's vertical scalability&lt;br&gt;- loose coupling&lt;br&gt;- data/information versus functional services&lt;br&gt;- static versus dynamic IP addresses&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is there any thinking on best practices on soem coding and designgenerics for public v's privae cloud ..etc&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for any comments and/or poiners&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mal&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maldini3105</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 9 Sources of Cloud Computing News You May Not Know About</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/9-sources-of-cloud-computing-news-you.html#comment-12539313</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another important source i have subscribed for cloud computing news is &lt;a href="http://www.oncloudcomputing.com/en/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.oncloudcomputing.com/en/"&gt;http://www.oncloudcomputing...&lt;/a&gt; . I get daily updated 15-20 important cloud computing news.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Damien</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:08:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Wisdom of Clouds is moving!!!</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/wisdom-of-clouds-is-moving.html#comment-9326995</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Too bad you have to register to comment on the new posts. I used to like to read them and put my 2 cents in! I'm happy for you, though. Good luck!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ares</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 11:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Do Your Cloud Applications Need To Be Elastic?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/do-your-cloud-applications-need-to-be.html#comment-8804269</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this post - i have been trying to work out which to chose - colocation or on site this is a great cost analysis break down. Cheers&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">colocation</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:01:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cloud Computing on Google Groups is Dead to Me</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/09/cloud-computing-on-google-groups-is.html#comment-8189968</link><description>&lt;p&gt;try &lt;a href="http://www.speakingcloud.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="www.speakingcloud.com"&gt;www.speakingcloud.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mike</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 07:21:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Quick Guide To The "Big Four" Cloud Offerings</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/quick-guide-to-big-four-cloud-offerings.html#comment-7880563</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Based on your table my choice would be for the big "Two".  Google and Amazon.  Concerns about "lock in" would remove Salesforce and Microsoft from my consideration.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Khürt L. Williams</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 09:35:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why cloud computing doesn't get us out of the woods yet...</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/06/why-cloud-computing-doesnt-get-us-out.html#comment-7814072</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm sure that advances will appear over the coming years to bring us closer, but at the moment there are too many issues and costs with network traffic and data movements to allow it to happen for all but select processor intensive applications, such as image rendering and finite modelling.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liftchair</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 00:45:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Wisdom of Clouds is moving!!!</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/wisdom-of-clouds-is-moving.html#comment-7107397</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to talk to you about your articles. Please email me.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SV</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:41:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/in-cloud-computing-good-network-gives.html</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/in-cloud-computing-good-network-gives.html#comment-6068552</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Two places to pick up the conversation:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;My new blog on CNET: &lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/the-wisdom-of-clouds" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.cnet.com/the-wisdom-of-clouds"&gt;http://news.cnet.com/the-wi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Greg Ness founded &lt;a href="http://infra20.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://infra20.com"&gt;http://infra20.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesurquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 11:22:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/in-cloud-computing-good-network-gives.html</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/in-cloud-computing-good-network-gives.html#comment-6068219</link><description>&lt;p&gt;where can i get more information on network related to cloud computing? seriously interesting stuff u've got here man&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kanimas</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 10:54:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The enterprise "barrier-to-exit" to cloud computing</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/enterprise-barrier-to-exit-to-cloud.html#comment-5827203</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Key flaw in this argument is that enterprises do very little new project development and that they are happy with their existing infrastructure. Many customers I work with do have very high barrier of exit but they do not want to just get up and move. Instead they are looking if new projects are good cloud candidates and many are. Secondly, there are number of clients who have outsourced their operations to companies like CSC or big indian pureplays are not particularly happy. There is substantial pain that makes them look at the cloud over again.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mikhail Malamud</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:48:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The enterprise "barrier-to-exit" to cloud computing</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/enterprise-barrier-to-exit-to-cloud.html#comment-5791819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a really great, insightful post.  I like your point on traditional organisations with a sunk investment in infrastructure having a barrier to shift into the realm of cloud computing.   It made me realise that the cloud can harbour agile organisations, that leverage meta-data trends from the web to target their services, then as the niche dies down and becomes less profitable, they can quickly move onto targeting the next hot spot.  Large enterprises simply can move that quickly, so this is a good strategic opportunity for SMEs. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin Grant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:03:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Amazon in Danger of Becoming the WallMart of the Cloud?</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/10/is-amazon-in-danger-of-becoming.html#comment-4706925</link><description>&lt;p&gt;i agree, commercialism has invaded rural areas therefore "killing" town businesses. as much as we want to "save" them, there is also what we call "saving" money. the most logical thing is to probably go where the goods are cheap.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">homesteading</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:34:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Wisdom of Clouds is moving!!!</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/wisdom-of-clouds-is-moving.html#comment-4603146</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are tradeoffs, to be sure.  (For instance, I can't track my own traffic anymore, so I must break my statistical crack addiction.) However, in the long term it will be an invaluable venue.  I hope to entice you to read as many as possible, but I, too, will miss the long-form feeds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks to you and all of the other gracious readers out there for turning what was just a place to vent into a community that I treasure and aim to serve the best I can.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jamesurquhart</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 01:02:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: VMWare (Finally) Joins the Cloud Computing Race</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/06/vmware-finally-joins-cloud-computing.html#comment-4586260</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;we are considering to buy a VMware Virtual Center.&lt;br&gt;We have two servers running VMware Standard edition.&lt;br&gt;Do you believe it will be worth it? Or do we have to&lt;br&gt;upgrade our VMware licenses to Enterprise before upgrading&lt;br&gt;virtual center to make it worth it. I had just read the&lt;br&gt;following article&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.virtualizationteam.com/virtualization-vmware/vmware-virtual-server-virtualization-vmware/virtualcenter-for-vm-ware-server-real-value.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.virtualizationteam.com/virtualization-vmware/vmware-virtual-server-virtualization-vmware/virtualcenter-for-vm-ware-server-real-value.html"&gt; VMware virtual center real value  &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shankyrhodes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 03:44:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Wisdom of Clouds is moving!!!</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/wisdom-of-clouds-is-moving.html#comment-4578610</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Congrats James. It's great news for you and for all the readers who may not have otherwise found you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For us long-time readers it's a bit bittersweet for plumbing reasons: the CNET RSS feed doesn't contain the full posts anymore (what a hassle, I used to always read your posts in full but now I don't always click) and you have to register w/ CNET to comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We were spoiled... :-) All the best.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">William Vambenepe</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:50:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Quick Guide To The "Big Four" Cloud Offerings</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/11/quick-guide-to-big-four-cloud-offerings.html#comment-4361057</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm really waiting to see the features on Sun's offering (&lt;a href="http://network.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="network.com"&gt;network.com&lt;/a&gt;), which will come out sometime early after New Year's...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">agbiotec</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 02:00:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Two Faces of Cloud Computing</title><link>http://blog.jamesurquhart.com/2008/12/two-faces-of-cloud-computing.html#comment-4310595</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Probably we will see an evolution of Server Clouds to Scale-out Clouds in the following years. Since traditional software have to deal with problems of scalability and reliability, and in order to scale on these traditional architectures you need to invest a lot of money, IT departments will assign budget for new developments and evolutions that will handle scalability and reliability directly thanks to the services offered in the Scale-Out Clouds. I guess this is the goal of Azure and Caroline in the long term. &lt;br&gt;Server Clouds are not here to stay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">James Grid </dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 11:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>